Comparing TPL with other licenses

A side-by-side summary of TPL 2.3 against the most common permissive and copyleft licenses. This is a convenience overview, not legal advice — each license's own text is authoritative. TPL references link into the full text.

Condition TPL 2.3 MIT Apache-2.0 BSD-3-Clause GPL-3.0
Commercial use Yes, explicit Yes Yes Yes Yes
Modify & redistribute Yes, explicit Yes Yes Yes Yes
Patent grant Yes, explicit §3 Not stated Yes, explicit Not stated Yes, explicit
Copyleft on derivatives No — no copyleft §4.3 No No No Yes, strong
"Works built with it" are yours Yes — User Works §4 Not addressed Not addressed Not addressed Not addressed
Explicit AI / ML training terms Yes §4.4 Silent Silent Silent Silent (disputed)
Must document changes Best effort §4.4 No Yes (notices) No Yes (marked)
Trademark / brand protection Yes §8 Silent Limited Non-endorsement clause Silent
Third-party asset pass-through Explicit §6 Notice retention NOTICE file Notice retention Whole work licensed
Hosted-service notice path Explicit §5.8 Silent Silent Silent Silent (see AGPL)
Governing law / venue designation Yes §12.2 Silent Silent Silent Silent
License text size Long (~46 KB) Very short Medium Very short Long

"Silent" means the license text does not address the question; behavior then falls back to general copyright law and interpretation. The full texts: TPL, MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD-3-Clause, GPL-3.0.

The short version